Few people are aware that the future of communications in our country rests on seemingly arcane decisions on how we open up radio airwaves. Significant chunks of this public "spectrum" remain vacant or underutilized – even though they have the capacity to deliver high-speed Internet signals almost anywhere in the country – especially into rural or poor regions where people need it most.
Often it’s left up to regulators in Washington -- lawyers politicians and engineers ensconced within the Federal Communications Commission and congressional subcommittees -- to decide how valuable swaths of our air are to be auctioned off and doled out. Often times they don’t make the right decisions – and don’t take the public’s pulse before ruling -- and as a result new innovations are shut down, and the status quo maintained.
If used right, spectrum could revolutionize the ways we connect to one another -- and to laptops, cell phones, PDAs, music players and other mobile Internet devices. It can also deliver a wireless Internet into your house without the need for a telephone wire or cable modem.
Some available spectrum sends high-speed Internet signals through concrete buildings and over mountains; and can connect tens of million of Americans that are now ignored by wire-line Internet providers such as the incumbent phone and cable companies that serve more than 99% of home broadband customers in America..
Phone and cable lobbyists have been pressuring the FCC to hand over our airwaves to their bosses at AT&T, Verizon and Comcast. Their plan is to horde spectrum and stifle any competitive or cheaper alternatives to their incumbent networks.
This would be a disaster. After years of phone and cable company control over its Internet marketplace, the United States has fallen to 22nd in the world in high-speed Internet rankings, with few choices and some of the highest prices for the slowest speeds in the world. We will continue to fall as long as we let phone and cable execs dictate Internet access for most American users.
We don't want more of the same. These airwaves should be employed for the public good, to spark innovation and open up closed markets. They should be used to develop wireless alternatives to Internet access as usual.
Consumer and public interest groups have urged Washington to ensure that new spectrum is opened up and offered to new market players on a nondiscriminatory basis.
With open networks, the rest of the world has rapidly adopted high-speed, Internet platforms for education, economic innovation, creativity and civic participation. Countries like South Korea, Japan, France and Canada have leapfrogged the United States and now offer faster Internet connections at far lower prices.
It's time we opened up our spectrum and caught up.

Comments
What the people deserve is a fiber to the premises infrastructure. 99.2% of all Internet work is done from fixed locations, and fiber can bring data speeds to fixed locations that wireless will NEVER match. The recourse to wireless is predicated on the unspoken assumption that we can never get a worthwhile fiber to the premises infrastructure from the incumbents (existing tel/cable.) I claim this "surrender" is unwarranted, and that people should ignore offers of "other things" (wireless, BPL) in favor of getting what they could REALLY USE AND WOULD RATHER HAVE.
We will be talking about what 'wonderful' things we can do with wireless for years. It will remain talk. Speeds of access over wireless will always be comparatively slow, whereas fiber can be upgraded by a factor of 10 or 100 in speed by replacing simple adapters at both ends of the line.
A shining alternative for us, the consumers of "broadband", to escape being "stuck" looking for alternatives, is to OURSELVES BUILD WHAT WE WANT. You and the people of your town can get together to pool the money and municipal loans to go out and install FIBER TO THE PREMISES that your TOWN then owns and CONTROLS. You and your fellow townspeople can build your OWN NETWORK whose STARTING speed of access will be ONE GIGABIT PER SECOND (1000 megabits per second, while the telcos and cablecos are ''competing'' for your business now with "real fast" speeds of only 12-15 megabits per second.)
Then there IS no "telco" or "cableco" to FILTER or BLOCK you, or tell YOU how to use YOUR network. No artificial pricing tiers, although each municipality has to calculate how to achieve sustainability of the operation of the network. No data-dipping (commercial spying), no embedded advertising; nothing, in particular, that was not something you chose.
And what you then GET is a FIBER NETWORK with GIGABIT SERVICE, rather than a slow and unreliable "wifi" service topping out at 20 megabits per second at best.
We ARE the people of this country, and we CAN and SHOULD build WHAT WE WANT TO USE. We do NOT want slow "wifi" or slow "BPL" (ethernet over power lines.) We want BLINDINGLY FAST FIBER SERVICE - NO MORE TOYS! NO MORE TOYS! GIVE US THE REAL THING!
Well, give it to yourselves. "they" will never give this to you, so the challenge stands: YOU collectivize and YOU build the network you want. Then YOU own it and YOU control it and YOU pay what it's worth (near cost), not what some moneygrubber thinks they can get away with.
See http://communityfiber.org.
Post new comment