There is a difference between available and accessible. In New York City, practically every household has at least one option for moderate-speed Internet service. Most have two: Time Warner and Cablevision connect to 98% of households and Verizon offers DSL to 87%.
Yet less than half of the city purchases the service. Broadband adoption rates in the Bronx rival those in rural America. Three quarters of low income households throughout the city do not have their own broadband connection. If you are a New Yorker reading this from your home, you are in a privileged minority.
Most efforts to address this problem focus on what’s called “demand-side stimulation.” That means trying to convince people to purchase a computer and an at-home broadband connection because, well, what crazy person wouldn’t purchase an Internet connection when they could? The problem must be in the people who aren’t on the Internet, rather than with the Internet itself. Of course, the people who have this idea all use the Internet every day and can’t imagine life without it.
If we’re going to make the Internet work for the other half of my city – and the other half of the country – we’re going to have to ask the people who know the Internet’s problems to help design the solutions.
We’re going to have to change the Internet so it reaches people how they want to be reached, rather than trying to change the people so they start using the Internet how the rest of us currently do. That means setting up wireless hotspots in barbershops and laundromats, in addition to libraries and cafes. And it means delivering high speed, open Internet to mobile devices, since so many more people already have those than have personal computers. We’re going to have to get Internet service to fit into people’s current communications budget, rather than expecting them to take on an additional expense.
It's time to stop fighting to preserve the Internet as it is and start fighting for the Internet we want – one that works for everyone.

Comments
It's the old TANSTAAFL problem. Obama is going to have us taxed to the max already, and prices will go through the roof, especially energy when coal gets driven out of use due to the unfounded global warming hoax. Where is the money to allegedly "give" everyone this high speed internet going to come from? Government doesn't have any money. They get it from us. Corporations pass taxes along in higher prices and there isn't a damn thing you or Obama can do to change that law of unintended consequences.
Look, I'd like to have high speed too. Unfortunately I'm in a rural area and would have to shell out $50/month or more for some satellite delivered service such as Wild Blue, but I sure don't expect you to help me pay for it. The only other option would be a WiMax setup. I've got some acres if someone wants to put up a tower. Still it would require the phone company to run some fiber out here and light them up with some DS-3 circuits. I sure don't expect you to pay for that either.
Scotty
Post new comment